An Application of the Social Judgement Theory

by Chuck Lloyd

The world is going to end.

The President of the United States is a racist.

Japan is going to take over the world.

The KKK is a nice group of people.



So each of these sentences has something controversial in it, right? What went through your head when you read them? Were you filled with emotions and over loaded with information? The social judgement theory looks at the many judgements and inferences that we draw when we first read or hear a particular statement.

When we hear or read a particular statement we look at how acceptable, objectionable or if it means anything to you at all. The sentences that I gave will effect people in different manners. People will feel a different range of emotions and no two people will feel exactly the same. Your experiences in life and your upbringing, knowledge and family background all play a role in how you as a individual will react to a certain statement.

If I were to read the four sentences above I would apply my personal beliefs to them and then form my opinion. That is what the social judgement theory says. When a person reads something we form an opinion based on our knowledge or personal beliefs. I personally feel that they all affect my life. I would definitely want to remove the President if he was a racist and I know that the KKK is not a bunch of nice people. Both sentences I feel promote hate against minority groups, which I feel, is wrong. I feel this way because of things I've read, seen and what values and morals that my parents taught me. The first and third however would effect my life in a very direct way. If the world ends that means that I won't be here anymore so I would become alarmed. I also would be alarmed if I heard that Japan was taking over the world because that would affect my life and how I live. Another key thing to understand is how people might interpret things and if they agree of disagree with what you are saying.

To look at this theory in more depth I am going to apply it to a movie that I feel has social judgement in it. The movie Sister Act is a comedy about a group a Las Vegas singer named Dolores VanCartia. Dolores sees her boyfriend Vince who has a man killed and then is put into the witness protection program. Dolores is sent to a convent because the police feel that would be the safest place for her. She then has to assimilate into being a member of the convent and live as a nun.

The social judgement theory comes into play all throughout the movie but the best example is when Dolores( now know as Sister Mary Clarence) takes the directors position of the choir. Before she joined the choir it couldn't carry a tune and was out of balance . Mary Clarence being from a Las Vegas show background got the choir so that it could carry a tune and reorganized what part each person sang so that there would be balance. She incorporated new dance moves and put a little pizzazz into the old church tunes. All of these new changes fell into the latitude of acceptance for all of the nuns that were in the choir. They all were very excited about the changes and couldn't wait for the performance.

After their first performance she had good and bad reactions from various people. The acceptance for the new style came from the nuns in the choir and the Father. The nuns were excited and felt that they had accomplished something, The Father told Mary Clarence that the music called to the people on the street and to keep up the good work. So the Father, Nuns and people off the street liked the new style so it fell into their latitude of acceptance. The rejection came from the Reverend Mother. She was very upset about the dancing moves and the "boogie-woogie" on the piano. She personally felt that the choir needed to stay with the more traditional style. The whole entire "new" choir fell into the latitude of rejection. She complained and was going to take Dolores out of her position until the father said that he loved the performance.

The ego-involvement for the Reverend Mother was that she didn't like it and was afraid of change. The Father and the other nuns liked the new way and adjusted to the idea that it was best for them and the church to keep the new style. The Reverend Mother demonstrates the concept of how ego involved that she is. She rejects all ideas of change and wants nothing to do with this new style. She cares deeply for the old traditional styles and doesn't want to see it changed or modified in anyway. Any new change to the nuns' way of life will always fall into the latitude of rejection with her. The other nuns and the Father see this as an opportunity to call out to other people and to get people to come back to the church to worship God.

In the end the Reverend Mother was persuaded to accept new style and realizes that the changes that happened to her convent especially the choir were for the best. It positively affected herself, the nuns, Sister Mary Clarence, the Father, the church and the community. So in the end her ego-involvement changed for the better because she realized that she was not keeping an open mind and in the end she was just hurting herself.

Make sure you look at these other pages also.

Lindsay's Critique

The Title Page

Check out this link about the Uncertainty Reduction Theory .The Reverned Mother and Whoopie are both strangers and they go through the process of getting to know each other or decreasing the uncertainty between them.